Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 11 v5] NUMA aware credit scheduling

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On mer, 2013-04-17 at 09:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> The #1 in this series was:
>  <c329410e453fd0108a9a.1365609899@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>       [PATCH 01 of 11 v5] xen, libxc: rename xenctl_cpumap to xenctl_bitmap
> which doesn't appear to have any comment from Jan nor an updated patch
> (or I've lost them)
> 
I think you're right.

> Perhaps you both meant #2:
>  <0af169dd6279b184d29f.1365609900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>       [PATCH 02 of 11 v5] xen, libxc: introduce xc_nodemap_t
> Which had comments from Jan, regarding the misappropriation of
> cpumask_bits(), and a revised edition in respectively:
>  <5165AD0102000078000CC38B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  <1365612074.13103.139.camel@Solace>
> 
> ?
> 
We do.

> I think this series now has all the required acks so if you can clarify
> which message ids contain the patches to be applied (or just repost as
> v6 if that's easier) I can get my shovel out...
> 
Let me refresh it to the current tip and resend as v6, I really think
it's easier for everyone! :-)

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel