Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 11 v5] NUMA aware credit scheduling

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 17:07 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On mar, 2013-04-16 at 16:49 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 11 v5] NUMA aware 
> > credit scheduling"):
> > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > - 1 and 2 touch tools/, but don't have a tools maintainer ack yet
> > 
> > I'm happy for 1 to have my ack provided that Jan's comment on it is
> > addressed.
> > 
> I did that already, by replying to his e-mail with an updated patch,
> since it was a very minor issue, involving only that very one. Of
> course, I can respin the whole series, if you like it better.

The #1 in this series was:
 <c329410e453fd0108a9a.1365609899@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
        [PATCH 01 of 11 v5] xen, libxc: rename xenctl_cpumap to xenctl_bitmap
which doesn't appear to have any comment from Jan nor an updated patch
(or I've lost them)

Perhaps you both meant #2:
 <0af169dd6279b184d29f.1365609900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
        [PATCH 02 of 11 v5] xen, libxc: introduce xc_nodemap_t
Which had comments from Jan, regarding the misappropriation of
cpumask_bits(), and a revised edition in respectively:
 <5165AD0102000078000CC38B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 <1365612074.13103.139.camel@Solace>

?

I think this series now has all the required acks so if you can clarify
which message ids contain the patches to be applied (or just repost as
v6 if that's easier) I can get my shovel out...

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel