Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 11 v5] NUMA aware credit scheduling

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On mar, 2013-04-16 at 16:49 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 11 v5] NUMA aware credit 
> scheduling"):
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > - 1 and 2 touch tools/, but don't have a tools maintainer ack yet
> 
> I'm happy for 1 to have my ack provided that Jan's comment on it is
> addressed.
> 
I did that already, by replying to his e-mail with an updated patch,
since it was a very minor issue, involving only that very one. Of
course, I can respin the whole series, if you like it better.

> I think 05/11 should explain in a documentation comment what it means
> for a domain to have a node affinity.  Specifically it's not clear
> from the docs there whether it's a hint to the hypervisor, or a hard
> requirement, and what semantic restrictions there might be on setting
> affinities.
> 
Actually, I tried to do right that in 11/11. I know, we want doc to be
in the same changeset of the change itself, but there is not just one
specific change that enables the new behavior, it's something resulting
from the joint work of 3/11, 4/11, 5/11 6/11 7/11 and 9/11, so it was
unclear to me where to update the doc, and that's why I opted for a new
patch, at the end of the series.

Or was it something different from what I have there that you had in
mind?

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel