Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 11 v5] NUMA aware credit scheduling

[George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 16.04.13 at 14:16, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Dario Faggioli
>> <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On gio, 2013-04-11 at 13:41 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>>>> Keir,
>>>>
>>> Ping?
>>
>> Given the state we are in the release cycle, and the importance of
>> this patch, and the relative simplicity of the changes in Xen outside
>> of the scheduler:
>>
>> Tim and Jan, would one of you be willing to use an "Apply unless Keir
>> objects" policy?
>
> Going through patches 1...5 again,
>
> - 1 and 2 touch tools/, but don't have a tools maintainer ack yet
> - 1 touches the public interface (even if only the one affecting
>   the tools)
...
> - 5 has a public interface change again

I thought the policy was that the tools & the hypervisor have to
remain in lockstep -- only libxl and the kernel interfaces need to be
backwards-compatible, right?  Do either of these changes affect those?

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel