[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: rename tiny64.conf to tiny64_defconfig
Hi, On 6/12/19 8:44 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 11.06.19 at 20:52, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Julien Grall writes:Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that documentation patch is going to be sent.Yes, sorry for the delay. I'm going to send resend the series soon. But I can see, that first two patches are already in the staging branch. Should I resend the whole series in this case? Or single patch with the missing documentation will be sufficient?You should never send patches that have already been applied.And another, slightly related question: I'm not sure what to do with my patch to get_maintainer.pl script. Should I resend the new version? Jan had comments only to commit message...Well, re-sending may make it easier, but first of all you need to get a maintainer to ack the patch. My Perl isn't good enough that I would feel qualified to give mine. Volodymyr, please resend the patch with Jan's comments addressed. I had a brief looked today and the patch looks correct. I will have another look on the next version. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |