Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: rename tiny64.conf to tiny64_defconfig

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 11.06.19 at 20:52, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Julien Grall writes:
>> Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a
>> separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that
>> documentation patch is going to be sent.
> 
> Yes, sorry for the delay. I'm going to send resend the series soon. But
> I can see, that first two patches are already in the staging branch.
> Should I resend the whole series in this case? Or single patch with the
> missing documentation will be sufficient?

You should never send patches that have already been applied.

> And another, slightly related question: I'm not sure what to do with my
> patch to get_maintainer.pl script. Should I resend the new version? Jan
> had comments only to commit message...

Well, re-sending may make it easier, but first of all you need to
get a maintainer to ack the patch. My Perl isn't good enough
that I would feel qualified to give mine.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel