Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: rename tiny64.conf to tiny64_defconfig

[Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>]

Hello Julien, Jan,

Julien Grall writes:

>>>>> On 16.05.19 at 15:37, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> As build system now supports *_defconfig rules it is good to be able
>>> to configure minimal XEN image with
>>>
>>>   make tiny64_defconfig
>>>
>>> command.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> you had objections here, and the first patch makes little sense
>> without the 2nd. May I ask what the verdict is, i.e. whether I should
>> drop these two from my list of pending patches?
>
> Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a
> separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that
> documentation patch is going to be sent.

Yes, sorry for the delay. I'm going to send resend the series soon. But
I can see, that first two patches are already in the staging branch.
Should I resend the whole series in this case? Or single patch with the
missing documentation will be sufficient?

And another, slightly related question: I'm not sure what to do with my
patch to get_maintainer.pl script. Should I resend the new version? Jan
had comments only to commit message...

--
Best regards,Volodymyr Babchuk
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel