[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: rename tiny64.conf to tiny64_defconfig
- To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:52:08 +0100
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 13:52:21 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 11/06/2019 10:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 11.06.19 at 11:27, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 6/11/19 7:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.06.19 at 22:03, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 6/5/19 5:01 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 05/06/2019 16:58, Jan Beulich wrote:
Julien,
On 16.05.19 at 15:37, <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
As build system now supports *_defconfig rules it is good to be able
to configure minimal XEN image with
make tiny64_defconfig
command.
Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
you had objections here, and the first patch makes little sense
without the 2nd. May I ask what the verdict is, i.e. whether I should
drop these two from my list of pending patches?
Volodymyr was going to resend the series with documentation (as a
separate patch). But I would be happy to take #1 and #2 assuming that
documentation patch is going to be sent.
You can consider this as an acked:
Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> for the two patches.
I was about to apply the two patches, but I don't seem to be able to
apply it because some lines contains =20. AFAICT, it is in replacement
of "space" in certain case.
Well, independent of any formatting issues you ought to have trouble
applying them since I did so already.
Hmm, I missed that. Sorry for noise.
Out of interest, how did you manage to apply it with the =20 in the patch?
There are no =20 in the mail that I did receive.
Sorry, I was talking about patch #1. Interestingly the Content-Type is different
between the e-mail received from exchange (this is a direct copy) and gmail
(this is received from xen-devel).
The gmail version doesn't contain it, while the exchange version does... Hmmm...
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
