[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] arm: traps: psci: use generic register accessors
On 08/08/17 21:37, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 08/08/2017 21:08, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c index 6cf9ee7..ed78b36 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c @@ -1449,13 +1449,12 @@ static void do_debug_trap(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, unsigned int code) } #endif +#define PSCI_SET_RESULT(reg, val) set_user_reg(reg, 0, val) +#define PSCI_ARG(reg,n) get_user_reg(reg, n) + #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_64 -#define PSCI_RESULT_REG(reg) (reg)->x0 -#define PSCI_ARG(reg,n) (reg)->x##n -#define PSCI_ARG32(reg,n) (uint32_t)( (reg)->x##n & 0x00000000FFFFFFFF ) +#define PSCI_ARG32(reg,n) (uint32_t)(get_user_reg(reg, n) & 0x00000000FFFFFFFF)There is no need for the mask as well as the explicit (uint32_t) cast. I'd recommend dropping the mask entirely. I want to avoid the implicit cast from 64-bit register to 32-bit that Volodymyr introduced in his series. uint32_t pstate = get_user_reg(regs, 1); IHMO this is a call to mistake. Another solution is to provide 3 helpers - get_user_reg32(...) - get_user_reg64(...)- get_user_reg(...) -> Return the full register (32-bit on ARM32, 64-bit on ARM64). This would at least document the return value of get_user_reg*. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |