[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 09/25] x86: refactor psr: L3 CAT: set value: implement framework.
- To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:13:05 -0400
- Cc: kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx, wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx, he.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx, ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mengxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yi Sun <yi.y.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 01:14:01 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
> If this reaction of mine is not acceptable, all I can do is refrain
> from further looking at this series. And Yi, I certainly apologize
> for perhaps not doing these reviews wholeheartedly, since -
> as also expressed before - I continue to not really view this as
> very important functionality. Yet considering for how long some
> of the versions hadn't been looked at by anyone at all, the
> alternative would have been to simply let it sit further without
> looking at it. I actually take this lack of interest by others as an
> indication that I'm not the only one considering this nice to have,
> but no more.
I do have an interest in this series. And I can certainly give it
a review - but once you get your teeth in a patchset I feel it is
bit counterintuitive to review it - as you do a much much better
job that I could have.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
