[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] PCI Pass-through in Xen ARM - Draft 2.
- To: Manish Jaggi <mjaggi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:34:09 +0100
- Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Prasun Kapoor <Prasun.kapoor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kumar, Vijaya" <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Kulkarni, Ganapatrao" <Ganapatrao.Kulkarni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:34:23 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
Hi Manish,
On 22/07/2015 06:41, Manish Jaggi wrote:
Can we keep this open and for now till there is agreement make
requesterid = bdf.
If you are ok, I will update and send Draft 3.
I think we can make an agreement on we are able to find a requesterID
based on the BDF but not that requesterID = BDF. There is different
reason for that: ARI, hardware quirks...
It would be nice if you can summarize how to find the requesterID,
StreamIDs (SMMU), deviceID (IOMMU) and use the name accordingly in the spec.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|