Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - 
trouble: broken/fail/pass"):
> No.  Each stable series has its own branch.

Oh well.

> I would recommend using the 3.10.y stable tree which is the current
> longterm stable tree.
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
> 
> branch: linux-3.10.y

OK.  I have made what I think are the relevant changes.  Specifically,
I have:

* Created a push gate for linux-3.10.y -> our tested/linux-3.0 branch
  (and pushed what is currently at 3.10.y to our branch)
* Dropped the tests of "linux" (Jeremy's branch)
* Switched the baseline kernel version for all other tests to
  our tested/3.10.

I expect to have some results from this tomorrow.  If I'm lucky I
won't have typoed one of the scripts...

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel