[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
>>> On 28.08.13 at 10:17, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > flight 18784 xen-unstable real [real] > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18784/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-amd64-xl 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 18778 > test-amd64-amd64-pv 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 18778 > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 18778 > test-amd64-amd64-pair 7 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. > 18778 > test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 15 guest-destroy fail REGR. vs. > 18778 > test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. > 18778 > > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): > test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 18778 > test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 18778 > test-amd64-amd64-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail like > 18770 At first I thought this ought to be a regression from either or both of 850188e1 and d838ac25 ("x86: don't allow Dom0 access to the MSI/HT address range"; those at least seem the most likely candidates to cause an early Dom0 death), but checking test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 the same kernel (afaict) boots fine there. The MSI change clearly isn't machine specific; the HT one of course gets used on AMD systems only (and indeed the failures are all on either of the two frogs, which are AMD systems, but iirc they're not the only ones - Ian?). Ian - I further wonder whether it wouldn't be good to always have "earlyprintk=xen" on the kernel command lines of the test infrastructure, to have better chances of investigating issues like this. And in any case the question of course is whether a failure with this old a Dom0 kernel really counts as a regression. It needs to be considered whether re-opening the latent problem these two changes address (and the HT one much more so than the MSI one, where from the above it looks like the MSI one isn't causing problems) is really better than rendering very old Dom0 kernels unusable. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |