[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

On 28/08/13 16:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - 
> trouble: broken/fail/pass"):
>> On 28.08.13 at 17:05, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> If you point me at something else to use as input to the push gate I
>>> would be happy to use that.
>> I guess the kernel maintainers are in a better position to point out
>> the most stable tree/branch to follow for that purpose.
> Is there a single branch or tag that always corresponds to the
> "current stable kernel" ?  Or do we have to update this every n months ?

No.  Each stable series has its own branch.

I would recommend using the 3.10.y stable tree which is the current
longterm stable tree.


branch: linux-3.10.y


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.