Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 28.08.13 at 17:24, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18784: regressions - 
> trouble: broken/fail/pass"):
>> On 28.08.13 at 17:05, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > If you point me at something else to use as input to the push gate I
>> > would be happy to use that.
>> 
>> I guess the kernel maintainers are in a better position to point out
>> the most stable tree/branch to follow for that purpose.
> 
> Is there a single branch or tag that always corresponds to the
> "current stable kernel" ?  Or do we have to update this every n months ?

I don't think there is, but I'd be glad to be told differently.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel