Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/16]: PVH xen: Add PHYSDEVOP_map_iomem

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:13:48PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:23:49 -0800
> > Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:05:40 +0000
> > > "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > >>> On 25.01.13 at 02:53, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > Since this happens once during boot, I am ok either way. Staying
> > > > > with what I've keeps linux code clean and also provides flexibily
> > > > > for future in case. But if you feel strongly, I can special case
> > > > > dom0 in linux to assume xen has it all mapped, and generate a
> > > > > patch there. Please lmk.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm, special casing Dom0 isn't what I'm after. I want this to be
> > > > transparent to the kernel in all cases (keeps the Linux code even
> > > > cleaner).
> > > 
> > > Ok. I am looking into it. Stefano, Ian, any comments? You guys OK with
> > > that approach? I probably won't need PHYSDEVOP_map_iomem then.
> > 
> > Forgot to cc stefano and Ian. Resending CCing them.
> 
> Yeah, it looks like a reasonable approach.

That would mean that the PVH domU with PCI devices would have do this
as well. Usually this is done in the toolstack - so would this mean that
the PHYSDEVOP_map_iomem would be used there? Or would it be just part
of the XEN_DOMCTL_iomem_permission?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel