Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC/PATCH v2] XENMEM_claim_pages (subop of existing) hypercall

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 15.11.12 at 19:00, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
>> Similarly, but perhaps of lower priority, there is no integration
>> with the low-mem handling.
> 
> I'd also consider this lower priority as Olaf and Andre
> have argued that the claim mechanism is not needed for
> sharing/paging so the two mechanisms may not
> be used together, at least for the foreseeable future.
> So I plan to skip this, unless you change your mind and
> consider it a showstopper for acceptance.

Skipping for the initial implementation is likely fine, but that
shouldn't mean deferring the integration indefinitely. Also,
I see no close connection between the low-mem feature
and sharing/paging (apart from Andres working on both).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel