Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC/PATCH v2] XENMEM_claim_pages (subop of existing) hypercall

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 15.11.12 at 20:15, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For 32 bit PV guests, note that a claim does NOT have to be
> staked prior to any allocation.  So if a toolstack needs
> to enforce that some portion of allocated memory is under
> a host address limit, it can (attempt to) allocate those pages,
> then stake a claim for the rest.  Or just not use the claim
> mechanism at all.

I don't get what you're trying to tell us here.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel