[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4 TSC problems
On 23 October 2012 16:43, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 23.10.12 at 16:07, Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 23 October 2012 13:50, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:50:13AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> >>> On 23.10.12 at 10:40, Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > On 23 October 2012 09:58, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 23.10.12 at 09:18, Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> A kernel run with no Xen underneath it. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Here is: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> uname -a >>>> >>> Linux xen-p02 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 10:07:46 UTC 2012 >>>> >>> x86_64 GNU/Linux >>>> >> >>>> >> I'm sorry to say that, but 2.6.32 is nowhere close to "recent" (as >>>> >> I had asked for). >>>> > >>>> > Sorry I'm using squeeze in production servers and I don't have a test >>>> > machine on which install wheezy. >>>> >>>> And can't/don't want to install a self-built kernel? >>> >>> You could also boot one of those Live Image kernels. Like an Fedora or >>> Ubuntu and just capture this. That way you don't over-write anything. >> >> Ok, I'll try the live image. >> Today I had another clock jump so cpuidle=0 doesn't work. >> I'll stay using clocksource= pit and cpuidle =0 for a while to see if >> they together work. >> But...how to know what C states the kernel uses? > > If "cpuidle=0" alone doesn't work, your problem is not C-state > related, and you don't need to look up how much of it the native > kernel uses. Ok, cpuidle=0 however is to be used because also clocksource=pit alone doesn't work. Now I'll use both params and see what happens. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |