[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4 TSC problems
>>> On 22.10.12 at 11:17, Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 22 October 2012 08:54, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 21.10.12 at 22:52, Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 15 October 2012 14:49, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So what's the contents of /proc/cpuinfo (any one CPU suffices) >> under a native recent kernel on that system? The most likely >> issue here is that we're mis-identifying the CPU as having an >> always running APIC timer (ARAT)... > > uname -a > > Linux xen-p01 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 13:49:30 UTC 2012 > x86_64 GNU/Linux I had specifically asked to do this under a _native_ kernel. > cat /proc/cpuinfo > > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 15 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7330 @ 2.40GHz > stepping : 11 > cpu MHz : 2400.176 > cache size : 3072 KB > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 10 > wp : yes > flags : fpu de tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr mca cmov > pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc > rep_good aperfmperf pni est ssse3 cx16 hypervisor lahf_lm > bogomips : 4800.35 > clflush size : 64 > cache_alignment : 64 > address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual > power management: > >> >> For a second, less intrusive try: Could you replace "cpuidle=0" >> with "max_cstate=1" (assuming the former didn't meanwhile >> turn out not to cure the problem)? If that works too (expected), >> try "max_cstate=2" followed eventually by >> "max_cstate=2 local_apic_timer_c2_ok". > > I'll try but to say that it works I've to wait at least two weeks. I understand that this takes quite a bit of time. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |