[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Via Nano X2 Support?
On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 21:00 +0100, Sam Mulvey wrote: > > Hi! > > Recently got a Via VE-900 board from Fry's. It has a via nano x2 > chip on it, and suggests that it has Intel-compatible virtualization > extensions. Has anyone worked with this board yet? > I thought it would be nice to have a lower-powered, nearly silent > Xen machine sitting on my desk. > > I tried booting into Xen, but it said it didn't recognize the > processor. I can post the full dmesg. It might be useful to post the logs to xen-devel, in case it's something simple... I'm not sure I've heard of anyone using the Via implementation of Intel's virt extensions. I expect that there will necessarily be some amount of heavy lifting required by someone who is interested in this platform. Ian. > Here's the /proc/cpuinfo (of one of the cores): > > > processor : 0 > vendor_id : CentaurHauls > cpu family : 6 > model : 15 > model name : VIA Nano X2 L4050 @ 1.4 GHz > stepping : 12 > cpu MHz : 1400.052 > cache size : 1024 KB > physical id : 0 > siblings : 2 > core id : 0 > cpu cores : 1 > apicid : 0 > initial apicid : 0 > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 10 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov > pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc > rep_good nopl pni monitor vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr sse4_1 popcnt rng > rng_en ace ace_en ace2 phe phe_en pmm pmm_en lahf_lm ida > bogomips : 2801.77 > clflush size : 64 > cache_alignment : 128 > address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual > power management: > > > -Sam > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |