RE: [PATCH][RESEND]RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Add fullevtchnmechanism for xen/ia64

[Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 13:35 +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:

>       When you say "blocked" state, does it mean "-b----" by xm list or 
> the network process is blocked? The first is always possible since VTI 
> domain needs to block for qemu emulation. If the second..., how many 
> processors have your box been configured? If domU and domVTI are 
> running on same processor, above slowdown may be worse since I 
> made test on a 4-P box with dom0/domU/domVTI running invidually.

Hi Kevin,

   It appeared to be stuck in the "-b----" state as shown by xm list,
but let me do some verification tomorrow.  Thanks for testing this.  I'm
running UP dom0 + 4-way SMP domU + UP domVTI on an 8 thread (4 core)
system.  Thanks,

        Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Linux & Open Source Lab


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel