Re: [PATCH 7/8] hw/9pfs: annotate V9fsTransport callbacks as coroutine_fn

[Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday, 21 July 2026 10:39:52 CEST Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 12:38 PM Christian Schoenebeck
> 
> <qemu_oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 21 July 2026 10:25:34 CEST Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > On 21/7/26 10:06, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:58 AM Marc-André Lureau
> > 
> > > > <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> > > >> most of them are "return-type co_annotation fn(..)"
> > > >> we even have scripts/block-coroutine-wrapper.py that relies and
> > > >> produce this order..
> > > >> a bit late to change the style imho...
> > > >> 
> > > >> At least, let's not make this a requirement for this series, please
> > > 
> > > Not a requirement on my side, but if we had to pick a style,
> > > I'd vote for "attribute before return type".
> > 
> > Yep, because that's a) the most compiler-friendly option (all compilers
> > allow it, including MSC) and b) it's the most diff-noise friendly
> > solution (can be prepended on its own line without touching any of the
> > existing line(s) at all).
> 
> ok, what should I do? Send a preliminary patch to fix all annotation
> positions? or just change the position in this patch or series?

Your decision. I'm just giving my 2cts. As this is not a behaviour change, it 
is way below my threshold level for taking any strong position. If you can 
make this for this patch for now, that would nice, but if not, not a deal 
breaker either:

Acked-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>