[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH for-4.21 04/10] x86/HPET: ignore "stale" IRQs
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 11:19:35 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=sZq96Ytn09krc7nKMIaw7UO4c8w+ULtWp8ZSmGY2ZSk=; b=A8T4aiBkU5m1uHKi/lx+C7QZLXjfkQb5qDAOXAUD0CLfKZ7BCbx9hhaTR1wavdgRS30afPTN7N8Eob3836oiyndg9kVpGLEABm2Ez7LdK3ORCu5JNYvJ21T2eER4L5vDDTR0HrrALHGzmoyudNtLB2Cuo6kMoR48SDkpACI/5uUAaSu2vcmeDRpQaJqGOie4LNA5WEw9TC8Xc6ziE1YFpQN7FN6UF66ViE0QLhPQpGZlbzWoyngpUiz5pbtACoMuDHxkoJmBJamqkZzxyiq3FXRHDKRND79S3NPD/K233Plx4FHO1Bj/zVVJckh5QKbRW7h4D48K1gpX0fD8lY4TFw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YMwsL2PUl+ohBZnApnrzId4B/OhnC/ZVmprIKCU3aHU2OkL/In4xhti8+cMaklsP2KOuBbF+8qfS7oy0ey6nv31KF9LoiMMeTB0TgSVV2g/qw8EFSqHDdbKwUMVJVi5dNC4YdlNJAFgrriTK6ZusAmq2vSUaMKid56/dLKMlyQd3eXu4fD+cUzQU2EN2QlNdVYTjHTyUpHbswtfqr8CX8haQdVzoduhFPkQpusFYErM9m6QBESCzZvXpGSMIbuOuBDRZomAZK8bDDZA6IHoWBhaTUsrwsjqFwohSnW5LgwN50YR4BOkHxss+0qP73NjYRjOrgqRwNDwIVQa5ep/QGA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:19:54 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 09:32:29AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Following hpet_detach_channel(), IRQs may still occur: Ones may already
> be in flight (both from before and after the last IRQ migration, i.e. on
> possibly two distinct vectors targeting two different CPUs), and new ones
> may still be raised as long as the channel is enabled.
Description would need to be adjusted if nothing else, as it speaks
about two distinct vectors which is no longer possible after patch 3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
With the above adjusted:
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Roger.
|
