[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3] xen-pciback: Consider INTx disabled when MSI/MSI-X is enabled
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 03:04:36PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:05:10AM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 04:49:23PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > Linux enables MSI-X before disabling INTx, but keeps MSI-X masked until > > > the table is filled. Then it disables INTx just before clearing MASKALL > > > bit. Currently this approach is rejected by xen-pciback. > > > According to the PCIe spec, device cannot use INTx when MSI/MSI-X is > > > enabled (in other words: enabling MSI/MSI-X implicitly disables INTx). > > > > > > Change the logic to consider INTx disabled if MSI/MSI-X is enabled. This > > > applies to three places: > > > - checking currently enabled interrupts type, > > > - transition to MSI/MSI-X - where INTx would be implicitly disabled, > > > - clearing INTx disable bit - which can be allowed even if MSI/MSI-X is > > > enabled, as device should consider INTx disabled anyway in that case > > > > Is this last point strictly needed? From the description above it > > seems Linux only cares about enabling MSI(-X) without the disable INTx > > bit set. > > I'm not sure, but it seems logical to have it symmetric. I don't have a strong opinion, but I would rather err on the cautious side and just leave it more strict unless explicitly required. > > > > > > > > Fixes: 5e29500eba2a ("xen-pciback: Allow setting PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL > > > too") > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > > > <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes in v3: > > > - allow clearing INTx regardless of MSI/MSI-X state, to be consistent > > > with enabling MSI/MSI-X > > > Changes in v2: > > > - restructure the patch to consider not only MASKALL bit, but enabling > > > MSI/MSI-X generally, without explicitly disabling INTx first > > > --- > > > drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c | 19 +++++++++++------ > > > .../xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c | 3 ++- > > > drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c | 21 +++---------------- > > > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c > > > b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c > > > index 059de92aea7d..d47eee6c5143 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c > > > +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space.c > > > @@ -288,12 +288,6 @@ int xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type(struct pci_dev *dev) > > > u16 val; > > > int ret = 0; > > > > > > - err = pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &val); > > > - if (err) > > > - return err; > > > - if (!(val & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE)) > > > - ret |= INTERRUPT_TYPE_INTX; > > > - > > > /* > > > * Do not trust dev->msi(x)_enabled here, as enabling could be done > > > * bypassing the pci_*msi* functions, by the qemu. > > > @@ -316,6 +310,19 @@ int xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type(struct pci_dev *dev) > > > if (val & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE) > > > ret |= INTERRUPT_TYPE_MSIX; > > > } > > > > Since we are explicitly hiding INTx now, should we also do something > > about MSI(X) being both enabled at the same time? The spec states: > > > > "System configuration software sets one of these bits to enable either > > MSI or MSI-X, but never both simultaneously. Behavior is undefined if > > both MSI and MSI-X are enabled simultaneously." > > > > So finding both MSI and MSI-X enabled likely means something has gone > > very wrong? Likely to be done in a separate change, just realized > > while looking at the patch context. > > Pciback try to prevent such situation (that's exactly the point of > checking the current interrupt type). But if you get into such situation > somehow anyway (likely bypassing pciback), then pciback will still allow > to disable one of them, so you can fix the situation (the enforcement of > "only one type at the time" is done setting the enable bit, but you can still > clear it). > > If both MSI and MSI-X are enabled xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type() will > return both bits set. > > > > + > > > + /* > > > + * PCIe spec says device cannot use INTx if MSI/MSI-X is enabled, > > > + * so check for INTx only when both are disabled. > > > + */ > > > + if (!ret) { > > > + err = pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &val); > > > + if (err) > > > + return err; > > > + if (!(val & PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE)) > > > + ret |= INTERRUPT_TYPE_INTX; > > > + } > > > + > > > return ret ?: INTERRUPT_TYPE_NONE; > > > } > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c > > > b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c > > > index 097316a74126..eb4c1af44f5c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c > > > +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_capability.c > > > @@ -236,10 +236,11 @@ static int msi_msix_flags_write(struct pci_dev > > > *dev, int offset, u16 new_value, > > > return PCIBIOS_SET_FAILED; > > > > > > if (new_value & field_config->enable_bit) { > > > - /* don't allow enabling together with other interrupt types */ > > > + /* don't allow enabling together with other interrupt type */ > > > > This comment needs to be adjusted to note that we allow enabling while > > INTx is not disabled in the command register, in order to please > > Linuxes MSI(-X) startup sequence. > > Ok. > > > FWIW, another option would be to simply disable INTX here once MSI(-X) > > is attempted to be enabled, won't that avoid having to modify > > xen_pcibk_get_interrupt_type()? > > I would rather avoid implicit changes to other bits, it may lead to hard > to debug corner cases (in this case, for example, if domU decides to > disable MSI-X later on, it would be left with INTx disabled too, so no > interrupts at all). I see, so a case where MSI(-X) setup fails and Linux simply disables MSI(-X) without clearing INTx disable because it assumes the bit is not set (because Linux hasn't set it). Makes sense. Thanks, Roger.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |