[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH 2/2] xen/delay: address MISRA C:2012 Rule 5.3.
On 09/08/2023 15:56, Luca Fancellu wrote: On 9 Aug 2023, at 08:55, Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The variable 'msec' declared in the macro shadows the local variable in 'ehci_dbgp_bios_handoff', but to prevent any future clashes with other functions the macro is converted to a static inline function. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/include/xen/delay.h | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/include/xen/delay.h b/xen/include/xen/delay.h index 9d70ef035f..9150226271 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/delay.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/delay.h @@ -4,7 +4,11 @@ /* Copyright (C) 1993 Linus Torvalds */ #include <asm/delay.h> -#define mdelay(n) (\ - {unsigned long msec=(n); while (msec--) udelay(1000);}) + +static inline void mdelay(unsigned long msec) +{ + while ( msec-- )Does misra allows to modify the function parameters? (Truly asking because IDK) I checked: there's an advisory (R17.8) that disallows this, but since advisories (apart from a couple of selected ones) are not taken into consideration for compliance, so it's not a big deal. Even less so since it's not a pointer type. -- Nicola Vetrini, BSc Software Engineer, BUGSENG srl (https://bugseng.com)
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |