[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH v2] x86/HVM: drop stale check from hvm_load_cpu_msrs()
Up until f61685a66903 ("x86: remove defunct init/load/save_msr() hvm_funcs") the check of the _rsvd field served as an error check for the earlier hvm_funcs.save_msr() invocation. With that invocation gone the check makes no sense anymore: It is effectively dead code due to the checking of the field in the earlier loop. While dropping the conditional also eliminate the "err" local variable (using a non-standard name anyway), replaced by suitable new/adjusted "return" statements. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- v2: Remove "err". Amend description. --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c @@ -1428,7 +1428,6 @@ static int cf_check hvm_load_cpu_msrs(st struct vcpu *v; const struct hvm_save_descriptor *desc; struct hvm_msr *ctxt; - int err = 0; if ( vcpuid >= d->max_vcpus || (v = d->vcpu[vcpuid]) == NULL ) { @@ -1479,7 +1478,7 @@ static int cf_check hvm_load_cpu_msrs(st return -EOPNOTSUPP; /* Checking finished */ - for ( i = 0; !err && i < ctxt->count; ++i ) + for ( i = 0; i < ctxt->count; ++i ) { switch ( ctxt->msr[i].index ) { @@ -1495,17 +1494,15 @@ static int cf_check hvm_load_cpu_msrs(st rc = guest_wrmsr(v, ctxt->msr[i].index, ctxt->msr[i].val); if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY ) - err = -ENXIO; + return -ENXIO; break; default: - if ( !ctxt->msr[i]._rsvd ) - err = -ENXIO; - break; + return -ENXIO; } } - return err; + return 0; } /* We need variable length data chunks for XSAVE area and MSRs, hence
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |