[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen PVH support in grub2
On 11/06/2017 02:16 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 03/11/17 20:00, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 11/03/2017 02:40 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 03/11/17 19:35, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>> On 11/03/2017 02:23 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>> On 03/11/17 19:19, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>>>>> On 11/03/2017 02:05 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>>>>>> So again the question: how to tell whether we are PVH or HVM in >>>>>>> init_hypervisor_platform()? ACPi tables are scanned way later... >>>>>> Can we make grub/OVMF append a boot option? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or set setup_header.hardware_subarch to something? We already have >>>>>> X86_SUBARCH_XEN but it is only used by PV. Or we might be able to use >>>>>> hardware_subarch_data (will need to get a buy-in from x86 maintainers, I >>>>>> think). >>>>> But wouldn't this break the idea to reuse the native boot paths in >>>>> grub/OVMF without further modifications? >>>> WDYM? We will have to have some sort of a plugin in either one to build >>>> the zeropage anyway. So we'd set hardware_subarch there, in addition to >>>> other things like setting memory and such. >>> But isn't the zeropage already being built? I admit that setting subarch >>> isn't a big deal, but using another entry with a passed-through pvh >>> start struct isn't either... >> I don't follow, sorry. My understanding is that zeropage will be built >> by PVH-enlightened grub so part of this process would be setting the >> subarch bit. > My reasoning was based on Roger's remark: > > "OTOH if Linux is capable of booting from the native entry point inside > of a PVH container, we would only have to port OVMF and grub in order > to work inside of a PVH container, leaving the rest of the logic > untouched." Right, and in my mind porting OVMF/grub includes creating proper zeropage. BTW, another option might be to "type_of_loader = (9 << 4) | 0", which is what init_pvh_bootparams() does. In fact, whatever is done in the firmware should probably match what that routine does. -boris _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |