[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [Minios-devel] [MirageOS-devel] [Xen-API] [RFC] Unicore Subproject Proposal



Hello,

Anil Madhavapeddy, on jeu. 14 sept. 2017 15:38:54 +0100, wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2017, at 17:13, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> > Anil Madhavapeddy, on mer. 13 sept. 2017 11:11:03 +0100, wrote:
> >> Maintaining a forked MiniOS has been a multi-year source of a maintenance 
> >> burden for MirageOS,
> > 
> > I'm just wondering why this happened?
> > 
> > The mini-os repository is open for development, it's just a matter of
> > agreeing on how to implement features :)
> 
> We forked it well before mini-os spun out into a separate repository,
> around 5 years ago.

Ok :)

> It's a combination of both I think.  I had a very quick look at the latest 
> mini-os
> tree and ran into build problems from the master branch

Ok, so it's just a matter of cleanly working on it.

Samuel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.