[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: don't leak PFEC_implict to guests
>>> On 06.04.17 at 16:33, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/04/17 15:27, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Doing so may not only confuse them, but will - on VMX - lead to >> VMRESUME failures. Add respective ASSERT()s where the fields get set >> to guard against future similar issues (or - in the restore case - >> fail the operation). In that latter code at once convert the mis-used >> gdprintk() to dprintk(), as the vCPU of interest is not "current". >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > I'd drop the unnecessary full stops from the printed text. Oops - I didn't pay attention (and even copied them). Thanks for spotting. > Either way, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |