Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: don't leak PFEC_implict to guests

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 06/04/17 15:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Doing so may not only confuse them, but will - on VMX - lead to
> VMRESUME failures. Add respective ASSERT()s where the fields get set
> to guard against future similar issues (or - in the restore case -
> fail the operation). In that latter code at once convert the mis-used
> gdprintk() to dprintk(), as the vCPU of interest is not "current".
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

I'd drop the unnecessary full stops from the printed text.

Either way, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel