[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] OSSTEST: Re-blessing cubietruck-{picasso, gleizes, metzinger} for production use
On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 11:52 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("OSSTEST: Re-blessing cubietruck- > {picasso,gleizes,metzinger} for production use"): > > I've been running a couple of adhoc production tests per day on these > > since > > before Xmas and they haven't lost sight of their disks again. > > > > TLDR; I think we should throw them back in the pool. > > Great. I'll take this as a "yes, go ahead" ;-) > > With the recent timeout fixes they are working as well as the > > production > > cubietruck-braque. > > > > There are two flakey testsÂtest-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds and test-armhf- > > armhf- > > libvirt-raw, but those appear to be much better than before the timeout > > changes and not specific to these three boards since the fourth one > > looks > > to behave much the same. > > > > At first glance it looks like some later test steps might just need a > > bit > > more time on CT too. > > Maybe we should have target_adjust_timeout honour a host property to > multiply timeouts by some factor. That's not a bad idea, assuming the remaining issues really are timeouts of this sort. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |