[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] OSSTEST: Re-blessing cubietruck-{picasso, gleizes, metzinger} for production use
Ian Campbell writes ("OSSTEST: Re-blessing cubietruck-{picasso,gleizes,metzinger} for production use"): > I've been running a couple of adhoc production tests per day on these since > before Xmas and they haven't lost sight of their disks again. > > TLDR; I think we should throw them back in the pool. Great. > With the recent timeout fixes they are working as well as the production > cubietruck-braque. > > There are two flakey tests test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds and test-armhf-armhf- > libvirt-raw, but those appear to be much better than before the timeout > changes and not specific to these three boards since the fourth one looks > to behave much the same. > > At first glance it looks like some later test steps might just need a bit > more time on CT too. Maybe we should have target_adjust_timeout honour a host property to multiply timeouts by some factor. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |