|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 test] 65633: regressions - FAIL
Robert Hu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 test] 65633: regressions -
FAIL"):
> On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 09:38 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > We test all kernel.org long term kernels in independent branches (from the
> > "linux stable tree" as you call it). This report is for the branch which is
> > testing linux-3.14.y.
>
> OK. I thought this linux-3.14.y was from osstest/linux-pvops tree.
> I previously used linux-stable tree's master branch for test
> development.
The osstest/linux-pvops tree contains branches which track the
corresponding upstream branches; they are updated from upstream when
the tests pass (strictly, when there are no regressions).
So our 3.14.y is just a perhaps-slightly-out-of-date version of
upstream 3.14.y.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |