Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 test] 65633: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 10:30 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 12:01 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 11:48 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 01:16 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > > > flight 65633 linux-3.14 real [real]
> > > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65633/
> > > > 
> > > > Regressions :-(
> > > > 
> > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > > > including tests which could not be run:
> > > > Âtest-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-startÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂfail
> > > > REGR.
> > > > vs. 64562
> > > [trim...]
> > > Hi Ian,
> > > 
> > > Why does it still fails there and even marked 'never pass' now?
> > 
> > This is the test of the linux-3.14 branch, not the xen-unstable branch
> > which was failing before.
> > 
> > Once the revert passes through the xen-unstable push gate then the
> > linux-
> > 3.14 branch (and most other branches) will pick up that change.
> > 
> > I don't know why the nested test case has never passed on the 3.14
> > branch,
> > someone would have to investigate if they think that is a problem.
> 
> I think better to use linux-stable tree, which I have always for the
> test development.
> I remember at very beginning, I tried to use the linux-pvops tree but
> failed. Result seems aligned with your side.

We test all kernel.org long term kernels in independent branches (from the
"linux stable tree" as you call it). This report is for the branch which is
testing linux-3.14.y.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel