Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 test] 65633: regressions - FAIL

[Robert Hu <robert.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 09:38 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 10:30 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 12:01 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 11:48 +0800, Robert Hu wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 01:16 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > > > > flight 65633 linux-3.14 real [real]
> > > > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65633/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Regressions :-(
> > > > > 
> > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > > > > including tests which could not be run:
> > > > >  test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-start           fail
> > > > > REGR.
> > > > > vs. 64562
> > > > [trim...]
> > > > Hi Ian,
> > > > 
> > > > Why does it still fails there and even marked 'never pass' now?
> > > 
> > > This is the test of the linux-3.14 branch, not the xen-unstable branch
> > > which was failing before.
> > > 
> > > Once the revert passes through the xen-unstable push gate then the
> > > linux-
> > > 3.14 branch (and most other branches) will pick up that change.
> > > 
> > > I don't know why the nested test case has never passed on the 3.14
> > > branch,
> > > someone would have to investigate if they think that is a problem.
> > 
> > I think better to use linux-stable tree, which I have always for the
> > test development.
> > I remember at very beginning, I tried to use the linux-pvops tree but
> > failed. Result seems aligned with your side.
> 
> We test all kernel.org long term kernels in independent branches (from the
> "linux stable tree" as you call it). This report is for the branch which is
> testing linux-3.14.y.

OK. I thought this linux-3.14.y was from osstest/linux-pvops tree.
I previously used linux-stable tree's master branch for test
development.

> 
> Ian.
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel