[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] PV-vNUMA issue: topology is misinterpreted by the guest
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 11:05 +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:05:59PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > BTW, I've also been grepping, and I'm not seeing XENMEM_get_vnumainfo > > being called anywhere either... Well, no wonder, we're seeing vNUMA > > setup issues! If I did check for this before, I wouldn't even have > > tested PV-vNUMA in the first place!! :-O > > > > I actually wonder how _some_ of the vNUMA info get through!?!? :-O > > > > Maybe you're using a custom built kernel with my PV vNUMA patch in? > Yep, that must be the case... I only recalled about that after sending this email (no, I don't update Dom0/guest kernel for my testbox really often! :-/) > I sent that to you once because you wanted to test that. > And I confirmed it. Booting the guest with Debian's stick 4.0.0, I get this from Xen: (XEN) Memory location of each domain: (XEN) Domain 0 (total: 129914): (XEN) Node 0: 56111 (XEN) Node 1: 73803 (XEN) Domain 2 (total: 262144): (XEN) Node 0: 131072 (XEN) Node 1: 131072 (XEN) 2 vnodes, 4 vcpus, guest physical layout: (XEN) 0: pnode 0, vcpus 0-1 (XEN) 0000000000000000 - 0000000020000000 (XEN) 1: pnode 1, vcpus 2-3 (XEN) 0000000020000000 - 0000000040000000 But the (PV) guest does not actually know anything about vNUMA: root@test:~# numactl --hardware available: 1 nodes (0) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 node 0 size: 993 MB node 0 free: 918 MB node distances: node 0 0: 10 Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |