Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 59041: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 59041: regressions - 
trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass"):
> So it is bisecting all five trees, right? (Well, four -- firmware hashes 
> don't seem to be changing).

Yes.  It has made the unified revision graph you see, where each node
is a version of each tree, and each edge changes the version of only
one of the trees.

> And if I assume that the issue is with kernel (which may not be a good 
> assumption, but for the sake of my understanding of how the graph works) 
> then d048c068d00d (green) was good and ea5dd38e93b3 (red) is bad?

Yes.

> What about the one right below red (d24b9b8d95f0) --- is it bad or
> good?

It has not been tested.  And, depending on what happens, it may not
ever be tested.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel