Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 59041: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/07/2015 03:39 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 12:06 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > Bisection was broken for linux-3.18 until this morning, Ian fixed the
> > > config and it should pick up on this failure and start investigating
> > > once the next flight completes (tonight some time).
> > OK, I'll wait until tomorrow then to see if it (the bisection) is
> > successful.
> After flight 59075 failed it has now started, progress is recorded at:
>
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/linux-3.18/test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel.guest-start.html
>
> It's currently reproducing the baseline pass (the double line around a
> cell indicates what it is currently testing). The hashes in each cell
> are in the same order as the tree list at the top, i.e Linux is the
> first entry and Xen is the last.
>
> Scheduling wise I don't think it is going to have made very much
> progress by the time you get in today though.

So it is bisecting all five trees, right? (Well, four -- firmware hashes 
don't seem to be changing).
And if I assume that the issue is with kernel (which may not be a good 
assumption, but for the sake of my understanding of how the graph works) 
then d048c068d00d (green) was good and ea5dd38e93b3 (red) is bad? What 
about the one right below red (d24b9b8d95f0) --- is it bad or good?
-boris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel