Re: [Xen-devel] Security policy ambiguities - XSA-108 process post-mortem

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.10.14 at 16:31, <msw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On this point in particular, back in 2012 [1] I suggested that all
> membership requests should be discussed in public on a community email
> list like xen-devel, or another email list to avoid noise. The Xen
> Project Security Team shouldn't have to evaluate petitions for
> membership while managing an embargoed issue. I brought this up again
> in 2013 [2] regarding the Coverity process.

And indeed I had intended to bring this point up too, but then forgot.
So - thanks for raising this!

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel