Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: domain_update_node_affinity: Correct the ASSERT

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 28.07.14 at 19:31, <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/28/2014 06:25 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> On ven, 2014-07-25 at 16:30 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> The commit "move domain to cpupool0 before destroying it" make Xen crashes
>>> when a domain is destroyed with d->vcpus allocated but no VCPU initialized.
>>>
>> The title of the commit is certainly useful. Perhaps the beginning of
>> the hash would have been too.
> 
> I didn't add the commit. Because it will be backported to Xen 4.4.
> 
> Would it be fine to point to a Xen 4.5 commit in Xen 4.4 branch?

Yes. Backports are (supposed to be) identifiable (via some kind of
reference to the backported commit), which would implicitly mean
any commit IDs referenced in the description refer to the master
branch. Furthermore, if someone wanted to look up the
referenced commit, having the (beginning of the) hash in hands
makes this a much more immediate action than just the title; I
believe such a lookup would even succeed on any of the stable
branches, as - luckily - we decided to make them branches rather
than standalone trees.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel