[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for xen-4.4] libxl: add option for discard support to xl disk configuration
Olaf Hering writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for xen-4.4] libxl: add option for discard support to xl disk configuration"): > On Wed, Feb 05, George Dunlap wrote: > > Well it looks like in order to keep ABI compatibility (which I don't think > > we ever promised), you're introducing this weird hack with overloading a > > putative boolean value with a magic number? > > Yes, thats the point. If libxl_device_disk changes then IMO the SONAME > has to change as well. And is 4.4-rc4 is the right time to do that? > Likely not. I'm fine with carry the 4.4 patch to achieve the result, and > put the other version into 4.5. I think there is no reason not to change the ABI now. RCs are provided for testing purposes, not production use. The real question is whether the actual functional patch ought to be accepted. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |