[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] HVM crash system on AMD APU A8-6600K
>Does it start with debug=n, but without trying to passthrough the pci device >(the graphics core of the apu?) to the hvm ? No it crashes even with empty HVM domain (no os, no disk images no network) >Can you explain "=== whole system crashed ===" a little more. II means system instantly rebooted. Black screen, no messages, no image on screen next what I see is POST of my real hardware. Log of xen runned with debug=y attached,hvm dom runned and no crash. On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Vitaliy Tomin <highwaystar.ru@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>Does it start with debug=n, but without trying to passthrough the pci device >>(the graphics core of the apu?) to the hvm ? > > No it crashes even with empty HVM domain (no os, no disk images no network) > >>Can you explain "=== whole system crashed ===" a little more. > > II means system instantly rebooted. Black screen, no messages, no > image on screen next what I see is POST of my real hardware. > > Log of xen runned with debug=y attached,hvm dom runned and no crash. > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Andrew Cooper > <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 03/02/14 13:58, Vitaliy Tomin wrote: >>> lspci output attached. >>> >>> I have never managed to crash system with debug=y, but I can provide >>> serial log captured with debug=y and HVM domain running up. >> >> That is a curious data point - it would imply that debug mode is doing >> something which non-debug mode fails to do. >> >> Could you provide the log please? >> >> Can you explain "=== whole system crashed ===" a little more. >> >> Given the lack of stack trace or any hint of a problem from Xen, is it a >> system hang? Does adding "watchdog" to the Xen command line cause the >> failure to change? >> >> >> Looking back at the debug=n serial log in combination with the PCI topology, >> >> (XEN) AMD-Vi: No iommu for device 0000:00:00.2 >> (XEN) setup 0000:00:00.2 for d0 failed (-19) >> >> Device 00:00.2 is the IOMMU itself. I would have thought applying IOMMU >> translation to the IOMMU is going to end in tears. Suravee; Can you >> comment about this? is the IOMMU expected to have an IVRS entry? >> >> ~Andrew Attachment:
screenlog.0 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |