[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3-RESEND 03/28] libxl: ocaml: avoid reserved words in type and field names.
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 14:27 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH v3-RESEND 03/28] libxl: ocaml: avoid > reserved words in type and field names."): > > On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 15:24 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > That would be fine by me. I would marginally prefer to simply dump a > > > list of the ocaml keywords into the ocaml idl generator. > > > > http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml-4.01/manual044.html seems to > > have a list, I suppose it is reasonably static across ocaml updates? > > It's not too insane to include it all now. Using most of them in our ABI > > would be a bug in our ABI IMHO > > Right. > > > and/or are already C reserved words (e.g. "else", "false" etc). > > Irrelevant now, but I would be tempted to say that if we would really > want to pick a C reserved word for an IDL item we should do a similar > workaround for C. Ie I don't think C should be special. Sounds reasonable. > But C's set > of reserved words is small enough that it's not very likely. Yes. > And even more irrelevant: this happened to me in a previous life. We > had an IDL-based code generator. One of the fields in one of our > structs was called "export". A few years later, the C++ people > decided to introduce a new keyword, "export". We were quite cross... I can imagine ;-) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |