[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3-RESEND 03/28] libxl: ocaml: avoid reserved words in type and field names.
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 15:24 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Rob Hoes writes ("RE: [PATCH v3-RESEND 03/28] libxl: ocaml: avoid reserved > words in type and field names."): > > > There aren't all that many ocaml keywords, I suppose? I expect > > > many of them are unlikely field names. If we don't want to > > > enumerate them up front (which I would accept, it's a bit tedious) > > > I'd be perfectly happy to fault things in as the libxl IDL gains > > > new inconveniently named fields, it'll break the build so we > > > should notice pretty quickly! > > > > I'd be very happy with that, if it is acceptable to you and IanJ! > > That would be fine by me. I would marginally prefer to simply dump a > list of the ocaml keywords into the ocaml idl generator. http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml-4.01/manual044.html seems to have a list, I suppose it is reasonably static across ocaml updates? It's not too insane to include it all now. Using most of them in our ABI would be a bug in our ABI IMHO and/or are already C reserved words (e.g. "else", "false" etc). Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |