[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0 PATCH 3/3] PVH dom0: construct_dom0 changes

On 10/08/2013 10:57 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.10.13 at 11:39, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If it were just a question of cleaning up those bits, I could probably
have another draft posted sometime this week.  But if we're stepping
back and looking at whether this is the right approach, or whether
something like Tim has suggested -- basically making PVH to be HVM minus
qemu plus a handful of hypercalls, and most of the changes in the domain
builder rather than in Xen -- that will take a bit longer, particularly
because it would probably mean me having to understand and modify the
Linux side of things as well.  At this point I'm not really sure what
the best approach is going forward.

Indeed, this all sounds more like being in need of a discussion on
the summit then (which however would very likely mean that this
won't make 4.4).

Hmm, which will make my "PVH technical deep-dive" talk a bit challenging to write. :-)

Lars, any suggestions? I could just back out the talk (which would reduce my talk-writing load a bit), or I could try to talk about things in general and the issues we've been discussing.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.