Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0 PATCH 3/3] PVH dom0: construct_dom0 changes

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 08.10.13 at 11:39, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If it were just a question of cleaning up those bits, I could probably 
> have another draft posted sometime this week.  But if we're stepping 
> back and looking at whether this is the right approach, or whether 
> something like Tim has suggested -- basically making PVH to be HVM minus 
> qemu plus a handful of hypercalls, and most of the changes in the domain 
> builder rather than in Xen -- that will take a bit longer, particularly 
> because it would probably mean me having to understand and modify the 
> Linux side of things as well.  At this point I'm not really sure what 
> the best approach is going forward.

Indeed, this all sounds more like being in need of a discussion on
the summit then (which however would very likely mean that this
won't make 4.4).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel