Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0 PATCH 3/3] PVH dom0: construct_dom0 changes

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 08.10.13 at 09:51, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And just to be clear - _any_ of the "fixme"s we intend to allow to
> go in with this series is a compromise already, with - afaict - no
> precedent. The more you ask for, the more likely it'll become for
> at least me to start re-thinking about this. Over the past years I
> think we made good progress in morphing Xen from an
> experimental project to a stable, enterprise ready one. I'm not
> eager to see us get pushed back significantly on that road.

Considering the thread we're in - perhaps before adding Dom0
support with more hacks/fixme-s it would be more appropriate
to eliminate all the ones in the current pending series?

Question to both of you: What's the status of this anyway? If
I'm not mistaken there was (on IRC) talk of a regression the
latest series caused for HVM guests? Was this already sorted
out? Is there going to be an updated series getting us
reasonably close to finally get this in?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel