Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18851: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:06:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 18851: regressions - FAIL [and 1 
> more messages]"):
> > On 06.09.13 at 12:38, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > For -unstable this also resulted in just a single left test failure
> > (test-amd64-i386-pair   17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host),
> > which appears to be the result of the migration, after the
> > first few thousand pages, seeing a rapid decrease of speed
> > (which then likely causes that timeout). I couldn't spot anything
> > in the logs that would explain this though. But I did notice that
> > in two of the three runs there was not xend.log captured on
> > the source host in the first place - is there an explanation for
> > this?
> 
> Looking at the logs-capture log, it appears that itch-mite was totally
> unresponsive by then.  The log capture script decided to power cycle
> it.  After having done that, xend wasn't running.  Due to a bug in the
> script it didn't retry the log capture.
> 
> > In any event I'm going to take these almost-pushes as a
> > "good enough" sign to pull over the two or three commits into
> > the stable branches, in the expectation that we should be
> > able to get a push there over the weekend, and then release
> > early next week.
> 
> OK.
> 
> > Looking through the logs of *-mite it also seems like you gave
> > 3.11 a try, hitting a BUG() in balloon.c.
> 
> That'll be the "linux-linus" test, which isn't doing very well.

I think Boris has a patch for that fixes the regression.

> 
> Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel