Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 18851: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-unstable test] 18851: regressions - FAIL [and 1 
more messages]"):
> On 06.09.13 at 12:38, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For -unstable this also resulted in just a single left test failure
> (test-amd64-i386-pair   17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host),
> which appears to be the result of the migration, after the
> first few thousand pages, seeing a rapid decrease of speed
> (which then likely causes that timeout). I couldn't spot anything
> in the logs that would explain this though. But I did notice that
> in two of the three runs there was not xend.log captured on
> the source host in the first place - is there an explanation for
> this?

Looking at the logs-capture log, it appears that itch-mite was totally
unresponsive by then.  The log capture script decided to power cycle
it.  After having done that, xend wasn't running.  Due to a bug in the
script it didn't retry the log capture.

> In any event I'm going to take these almost-pushes as a
> "good enough" sign to pull over the two or three commits into
> the stable branches, in the expectation that we should be
> able to get a push there over the weekend, and then release
> early next week.

OK.

> Looking through the logs of *-mite it also seems like you gave
> 3.11 a try, hitting a BUG() in balloon.c.

That'll be the "linux-linus" test, which isn't doing very well.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel